Unlock Democracy: Dear Mark Harper
Monday, 26 March 2012
Dear Mark Harper,
Lobbying is an essential part of a healthy democracy. However, professional lobbying – an industry worth £2billion in the UK – can subvert democracy by giving those with the greatest resources undue influence and privileged access to politicians.
Three quarters of people want lobbying to be more transparent, over half of Conservative, and two thirds of Liberal Democrat voters think lobbyists have ‘too much influence’ in politics .
We welcome the government’s intention to introduce a statutory register of lobbyists, but its plans as they stand will fail to deliver on this promise. The proposals are flawed in two key respects:
1. Lack of universality
The current plans will only require lobbying agencies working on behalf of third parties to register. This would exclude some 2,500-3,500 in-house lobbyists – three quarters of the industry – whose activities are identical to agency lobbyists.
2. Lack of meaningful information
The government proposes that lobbyists only reveal who is lobbying. Information on a register will only be meaningful if lobbyists' are required to reveal their dealings with government – whom is being lobbied and what they are being lobbied on. We also think the amount of money spent on lobbying should be declared.
Where lobbying helps to inform decision-making, it plays an important role. But it must be conducted transparently. A robust public register of lobbying needn’t create an obstacle to this and shouldn’t place an undue burden on lobbyists (with sensible exemptions for small businesses and smaller charities).
We ask that you ensure that this opportunity to rebuild public trust is not lost, and introduce real transparency in lobbying.
Director, Unlock Democracy
ADD YOUR SUPPORT FOR LOBBYING REFORM HERE
 YouGov, 20-21 October 2011
Disclaimer: Press releases published on this page are from key opinion formers
who promote their organisation's activities by subscribing to a campaign site within
politics.co.uk. politics.co.uk does not endorse, edit, or attempt to balance the
opinions expressed on this page. The content of press releases are wholly the responsibility
of the originating company or organisation.
The shocking revelation that a Conservative party co-treasurer offered access to the prime minister and chancellor for up to £250,000 underscores the need for urgent reforms to clean up political party funding in the UK.
A bit of creative thinking could unlock the party funding impasse, a senior participant in last year's party funding negotiations has told me.
David Cameron has hosted "significant" Conservative party donors to dinner in No 10 three times since the general election, he has admitted.
Redistributing public money already spent on helping political parties could prove the key to ending Westminster's deadlock over party funding, Nick Clegg hopes.
As the cash-for-access scandal hits the Commons, MPs once again fail to rise to the occasion.
Ed Miliband has hit out at the Conservatives' "whitewash" inquiry into the cash-for-access scandal, amid turbulent Commons exchanges with Francis Maude.
Party funding is always going to generate cynicism from politicians and voters alike. Whether we reform or not, there is no easy answer.
The cash-for-access row threatens to turn into a full-blown scandal. Here are the five key questions which need answering.
Conservative treasurer Peter Cruddas has been forced to quit after a cash-for-access sting exposed him offering time with the PM in exchange for a £250,000 donation.
As treasurer, Peter Cruddas should have been briefed on what he could and couldn't offer. The incompetence on display here is astonishing.