It's no surprise that black and Asian women are hit hardest by austerity

"That the poorest BAME women have been hit hardest by austerity shouldn't be a surprise to anyone."
"That the poorest BAME women have been hit hardest by austerity shouldn't be a surprise to anyone."

By Kalwinder Sandhu

Back in 2010, Theresa May warned that there was a risk that women, ethnic minorities and disabled people would be "disproportionately affected" by the spending cuts planned by the Coalition. Seven years later, the scale of the impact is not just disproportionate, it is devastating.

The poorest Black, Asian, and minority ethnic (BAME) families are on course for a 20% drop in their living standards by 2020, according to a new report by the Women's Budget Group and Runnymede Trust. Meanwhile, lone parents, 92% of them women, are facing a drop in living standards of 18%.  

Dig into the data and the findings are stark. As a result of tax and benefit changes:


  • Asian women in the poorest third of households lose on average 19% of their income by 2020 (over £2,200) compared to if austerity had not been implemented
  • Black women in the poorest households will lose on average 14% of their income (over £2,000 a year)
  • In every income group, women lost more than men and BAME women lost more than white women

When tax and benefits are combined with public service cuts, the research showed that:

  • The poorest families will lose the most, with an average drop in living standards of around 17%
  • Black and Asian households with the lowest fifth of incomes will experience the biggest average drop in living standards of 19.2% and 20.1% respectively. This equates to a real-terms average annual loss in living standards of £8,407 and £11,678.
  • Lone mothers (who represent 92% of lone parents) will experience an average drop in living standards of 18% (£8,790).

But the numbers only tell part of the story. The research threw up heart-wrenching narratives from women about their daily experience of working hard to improve their lives and those of their children, while facing constant setbacks. One woman stated:

"My husband has lost his job and we don't have much money so we are only thinking about now sending our son to university and not our daughter".

This sent shockwaves to my personal sense of social justice for women. It particularly resonated with me as my own journey to obtain a university education had been a hard fought battle with family, extended family and community members. 

It became clear during the research that austerity was having serious implications for women's education. Young women were putting off going to university and becoming deeply concerned about taking on debts which were larger than their family incomes. Women from families on lower incomes saw stark difference between themselves and the students who had opportunities for internships because of financial backing from their parents.

These impacts have to be considered alongside the other findings of the report. They show that university education does not necessarily translate into well-paid jobs because of the racism and sexism that BAME women face in the labour market. Our household incomes are lower, which in turn means that BAME women may have to rely on an increasingly complex and punitive benefits system and reduced public services.

This new report is published on the same day that the government unveils its Race Disparity Audit, one which aims to "shine a light" on "uncomfortable truths". It is good that the government has recognised it needs to face these truths. But without acknowledging the impact its own policies are having, they will be unable to truly tackle the issue they've highlighted.

Kalwinder Sandhu wrote part of the report and ran focus groups in Coventry for the research. You can follow her on Twitter here.

The opinions in politics.co.uk's Comment and Analysis section are those of the author and are no reflection of the views of the website or its owners.

Comments

Load in comments
Politics @ Lunch

Friday lunchtime. Your Inbox. It's a date.

Newsletter update
wa